The compact in American society has always been hard work in
return for achieving the American dream. The rise of an
hourglass economy, however, results in a system whereby no
amount of hard work facilitates social mobility and economic
parity, and low-wage workers are in danger of becoming a
permanent underclass. Therefore, as we face a new high
technology, service economy replacing an industrial economy, we
are also facing the possible rise of a permanently bifurcated
labor force characterized by extreme economic inequality with a
shrunken middle class. Should this new structure replace the
classic American ideal of an egalitarian middle class society,
we will need to think not only of the economic, but also of the
political and social consequences.
For two decades or more sociologists, economists and public
intellectuals have been amassing a body of data documenting the
increase in economic inequality in this country. The
preponderance and pervasiveness of evidence has tilted the
interpretation in favor of concluding a marked increase in
economic inequality, if not an extreme increase. Inequality,
however, is not a cause; it is a consequence. The critical
issue/debate consists in whether the “forces” producing economic
inequality are 1) socio-politically driven and able to be
corrected by countervailing sociopolitical actions or 2)
structural characteristics inherent in the new high technology
service economy and immune to social or political interests bent
on promoting less economic divergence.
Dr. John Koval
Egan Urban Center, DePaul University
990 W. Fullerton Ave., Suite 3100
Chicago, IL 60614